Bylaws: document for comment and approval

Navigation

committee
past winners
docs & forms
links
rankings
gallery
hall of fame

Categories


All categories

Quicksearch

Mon 17-05-10

Bylaws: document for comment and approval

Posted by
Matt Kendrick
in Meetings, News at 19:26 | Comments (2)

Players,

Please find linked below a draft document that seeks to bring the ACTEBA Bylaws up to date with current practices and procedures.

The draft document is open for consideration and comment. The goal is to table the completed document at the June captain's meeting and approve the changes within.

Please read it over. If you have any questions or comments, use the contact form to get in touch with a committee member.

http://www.acteba.com.au/downloads/2010_bylaws_updates.doc
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
Bylaw 42 - Assumes competition will always be 14 weeks long which it may not be. Maybe his Bylaw should be changed to read "A player must be registered prior to the commencement of round 2 to be eligible to compete in Finals matches."

Bylaw 52 - It is still and AEBF requirement that players must have played in 33.33% of State/Territory local competition to be eligible to represent the State/Territory and the National Championships.

Bylaw 55 - There are only 9 spots available to each State and Territory for the Australian Ladies Singles.

Bylaw 65 - Does this mean that an ACTEBA Life Member or Hall of Famer can only be granted an exemption from selection trials fees if one of the current Core Executives invokes it for them?

Bylaw 93 - Time out is granted at the umpire’s discretion. There should be no caveats placed on what should or should not be granted as a time out.

Table specifications - Even though this cannot be enforced this should be left in as a guide for venues who wish to set there tables up properly and for future committees on how tables should be set up for National titles.
#1 Doug Percy on 2010-05-18 11:11 (Reply)
Also note that ByLaw 24 should have the additional clause that no team should move up or down more than one division between seasons (refer April 2010 minutes).

Matt K
#2 Matt K on 2010-05-24 10:35 (Reply)
Add Comment
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
   
 

Socialise!

Poll:

Do you vote on the poll?
Yes
No
No.. wait, whut?

Archives

Syndicate This Blog